Outcome
You receive a written technical assessment with a documented scope, stated assumptions, clear limitations and prioritised options for action.
Assurance
Audits and assessments
Independent technical assessments of software, architecture, security and AI, with a documented methodology, clear reasoning and a defined scope.
At a glance
- Working mode
- Assurance
- Typical stakeholders
- Leadership teams, Product owners, Legal or procurement stakeholders
- Outcome
- You receive a written technical assessment with a documented scope, stated assumptions, clear limitations and prioritised options for action.
Mandate
The technical focus.
We independently examine systems, architecture, code and operational risks. The methodology, assumptions, assessment criteria and limitations are stated in the result.
Suitable for
- Leadership teams
- Product owners
- Legal or procurement stakeholders
Process
How the collaboration works.
The exact shape depends on your request - the frame remains transparent in every case.
Process
Step 1
Clarify mandate
Step 2
Inspect systems
Step 3
Deliver assessment
Step 1
At the outset, we clarify the reason for the assessment, the specific question, scope, available evidence and intended use of the result.
Step 2
We examine the agreed systems, architecture, data flows and operational risks against the defined criteria and document the approach in the report.
Step 3
The report separates observed findings, technical judgement, underlying assumptions and the resulting options for action.
Results
What is delivered.
A technical assessment whose question, approach and reasoning are documented clearly for internal and external stakeholders.
An overview of identified risks and possible measures, prioritised by relevance, urgency and implementation effort.
A documented basis for deciding whether further review, technical changes or closure of the matter is appropriate.
Boundaries
What we clarify upfront.
Technical assessment with a clear boundary: we assess systems and technical facts, not their legal interpretation.
No certification consulting.
We do not conduct conventional penetration tests. Our focus is architecture, code, data flows, processes and technical risks.
Related topics
Typical starting points.
AI Assurance and Technical Assessments
We examine AI-related risks, systems and decisions from a technical perspective and document the results in writing.
View topicSecurity Audits and Compliance
A traceable technical review of software, architecture, access controls and data flows, based on a clearly defined scope.
View topicDo you need an independent technical assessment?
Describe the reason, specific question, scope and timeframe. We will assess whether an audit, review or formal assessment is the appropriate format.