Typical trigger
Independent judgement for AI, software and security decisions.
We examine AI-related risks, systems and decisions from a technical perspective and document the results in writing.
Assurance & Security
AI Assurance and Technical Assessments
We independently assess AI systems, vendors and project status, documenting findings, assumptions and limitations.
-
Signal
A technical decision needs independent review
-
Risk
Assumptions and limitations remain unsupported
-
Guardrail
An assessment with documented findings
Situation
When this becomes relevant
Before an investment, a contract or when a project runs into difficulty, an internal assessment may not be enough. An independent technical review can make the decision and its risks understandable.
What needs to be assessed: the system, its architecture, a vendor or the current state of the project?
Who needs the result, and how will it be used: internally, with customers or as part of a formal process?
Which documents, contacts and system access can be made available for the assessment?
Risks
Risks to address
An unclear boundary between technical assessment and legal advice, leading to ambiguous conclusions.
Assessments that do not document their assumptions and limitations, leaving the strength of their conclusions unclear.
Recommendations that lack sufficient technical context or fail to assign clear responsibility.
Further reading
Do you need an independent technical assessment?
Tell us why the assessment is needed and what it should cover. Together, we will determine whether a review, audit or formal assessment is appropriate.